12 October 2009

UMA DAQUELAS SINGULARIDADES CÓSMICAS
EM QUE TOMÁS DE AQUINO, PAUL GAUGUIN,
JANE BIRKIN, SERGE GAINSBOURG E A BARDOT
VIVEM NA MAIS PACÍFICA E FELIZ HARMONIA

(a propósito da moral e da virtude)


Paul Gauguin - A Perda da Virgindade, 1890-91

Whether virginity is a virtue?

Objection 1: It would seem that virginity is not a virtue. For "no virtue is in us by nature," as the Philosopher says (Ethic. ii, 1). Now virginity is in us by nature, since all are virgins when born. Therefore virginity is not a virtue.



Objection 2: Further, whoever has one virtue has all virtues, as stated above. Yet some have other virtues without having virginity: else, since none can go to the heavenly kingdom without virtue, no one could go there without virginity, which would involve the condemnation of marriage. Therefore virginity is not a virtue.



Objection 3: Further, every virtue is recovered by penance. But virginity is not recovered by penance: wherefore Jerome says [*Ep. xxii ad Eustoch.]: "Other things God can do, but He cannot restore the virgin after her downfall." Therefore seemingly virginity is not a virtue.



Objection 4: Further, no virtue is lost without sin. Yet virginity is lost without sin, namely by marriage. Therefore virginity is not a virtue.



Objection 5: Further, virginity is condivided with widowhood and conjugal purity. But neither of these is a virtue. Therefore virginity is not a virtue. (...) (Tomás de Aquino, Summa Theologica, citado daqui)

(2009)

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

Interessante, mas a polémica não é um pouco datada? É quase como um post em defesa da legalização do divórcio...

João Lisboa said...

Mas quem fala em "polémica"? Ou de post "em defesa de"? É apenas uma constatação de como essas diversas personagens ligam todas tão bem.

Anonymous said...

Se é esse o leitmotiv .... Aliás, qualquer circunstância é um bom argumento para partilhar essas fotos (... e o quadro do Gaugin)